Home Up Contents

The Origin
 

The Origin
Bioinformatica

  The Origin

03/21/06

 

 

 

 

 

03/21/06

Home
The Origin
Bioinformatica

 

The origin of “fossil” fuels

 The change of scientific paradigms

R.N. Penninkhof

 

Foreword

 

For this thesis I wanted to find different examples of scientists who have had interesting new scientific theories which were not accepted, or even ridiculed by most scientists in the specific field. In many cases history proved the new theories of these scientists right. Most interesting off course are some examples that are still debated today. One might think that these topics are hard to find; and indeed, often the established scientific community is correct in holding on to well established theories, but I have found a few examples where there is still a hot debate going on. The main example (in this thesis) of an established scientific idea that is being overthrown at the moment is the theory of the origin of natural oil and gas. Here I present compelling evidence for the alternative theory; that oil and gas are not fossil fuels but originated from an abiogenic source. This new theory has been accepted by many Russian scientists, as well as a growing number of western scientists.  As a bonus I will discuss a possible biological explanation for so called paranormal phenomena such as telepathy and presentiment and give a few more examples of scientific revolutions.

 

Index

 

2: Foreword
2: Index
3: The abiogenic origin of “fossil” fuels
4: Evidence for the abiogenic origin of carbohydrates
6: Conclusion and discussion
6: Acknowledgements
7: Appendix I: Isotopic evidence of the abiogenic origin
8: Appendix II: Deep earth Gas and Earthquake Prediction
12: Appendix III: A possible explanation for paranormal phenomena
12:       Parapsychology
13:       Evidence of parapsychological phenomena: “The Ganzfeld experiments” “Retro PK Experiments”
14:       The quantum mind
15:       Quantum physics; feasible in the brain?
17: Appendix IV: Plate tectonics
18: Appendix V: Photosynthesis: Is sunlight really necessary?
18: Appendix VI: Thomas gold: The theory of hearing
19: References

 

The abiogenic origin of “fossil” fuels

 

We all have been taught where or oil and gas come from; they are fossil fuels. That means that millions of years ago there were enormous (tropical) forests and swamps where a large amount of carbon was captured from the air into biomass and later fossilized in the ground (1, 2). This biomass supposedly turned into oil and gas and coal by processes that scientists today do not fully understand. Nowadays there are scientists with a different opinion; they believe that natural gas and crude oil are derived from the initial materials that formed the earth. Even though this theory of so called "abiogenic formation" has a lot of compelling evidence in its favour it is still not commonly accepted among geologists.

Why are there two different theories?

The debate about the origin of petroleum has been going on since the 1860s, but since in the 1870s it was thought that the earth was thought to have formed as a hot body of molten rock, the debate silenced in favour of the biological origin theory. In such a hot body no hydrocarbons could have survived because they would have oxidized to carbon dioxide and water. Since the 1950’s it is known that the earth was not formed as a hot body; instead cold material from a nebula surrounding the sun accumulated by gravity to form the earth (3). The centre of the earth heated because of three reasons; radioactive decay, gravitational energy and chemical energy. When the carbohydrates became warmer a large portion became liquid or gas, and thus buoyant. This buoyancy forced many of the hydrocarbons to more shallow levels of the earth’s crust, while the centre of the earth became so hot that it melted.

The presence of the bacteria in the earth’s crust, the so called “deep hot biosphere”, is also indicative of the “cold” formation of the earth; if the earth had had a hot origin the high temperatures would have "burnt" most energy containing chemicals to a state where bacteria could not oxidize them any further for their metabolism.

Another argument for the biological origin theory was the presence of biomolecules in petroleum. Since people in the past did not know about the bacteria that live deep in the earth’s crust, they took the presence of the biomolecules as evidence for the fossil origin of petroleum. Since microbiologists have discovered that bacteria live in great quantities in the earth’s crust (4, 70), this argument has also vanished. The biomolecules in oil can originate from sub-surface bacteria. This bacterial origin would also explain that the type of biomolecules in oil is different from the type of biomolecules formed by surface life. The biomolecules that were said to be "molecular fossils" in oil consist of molecules like the porphyrins that are a closed bridge structure of four pyrol rings which can form complexes with metal atoms (5). These porphyrins are formed in surface life in chlorophyll, which contains a magnesium ion and in haemoglobin and cytochrome, which contains iron atoms. In oils iron and magnesium complexes have never been found, but only vanadium and nickel complexes. Sometimes these nickel porphyrins are considered to be an unknown chlorophyll or pophyrin structure (6). There are also some oils in which no biomolecules can be detected.

 

 

 

Evidence for the abiogenic origin of carbohydrates

 

 

I have summarised the evidence previously used for the abiogenic theory (7). More recent experiments on high pressure hydrocarbon formation (8) have shown that hydrocarbons are stable at great depths and that the mixture of hydrocarbons found in petroleum must have formed at depths greater than those of sediments.

Reservoirs of petroleum and gas often occur in geographical patterns of long lines or arcs extending for hundreds or even thousands of kilometres (Figure 1). Mendeleyev (known from the periodic system) noted this first in the 1870’s (9). This is an indication for the common origin of the petroleum from a deeper layer than the sediments. The petroleum is found in a large area that encompasses different geological origins.

Figure 1. Oil fields of the Middle East, showing continuous region from Turkey to Oman. The dots represent individual fields, and the size of each dot indicates the magnitude of the field. (10)

Carbohydrates from a large area often show common chemical features regardless of the varied composition of the substrate in which they are found.  

Methane is found in many locations that lack a biogenic explanation. This occurrence of methane might be explained in different ways; instead of having formed from primordial hydrocarbons or being primordial this methane might have been formed from solid iron oxideFeO, marble, CaCO3 and water. At high pressure and temperature these substrates have been demonstrated to produce hydrocarbons (11,12).

Hydrocarbon-rich areas tend to be hydrocarbon-rich at all (reachable) lower levels, corresponding to quite different geological periods and extending down to the crystalline basement that underlies the sediment. This is known as Koudryatsev’s rule (13).

A number of carbohydrate reservoirs seem to be refilling as they are exploited. This can be explained by upwelling hydrocarbons from lower levels.

The distribution of the large amounts of carbonate rock in the upper crust and the isotopic composition of their carbon atoms argue against the theory of biological origin of most of the hydrocarbons (see isotopic evidence, appendix I).

Regional associations of hydrocarbons with helium can be explained when we assume that the hydrocarbons have ascended from great depth. Methane upwelling from great depth mixes with helium when it flows through rock pores. Helium is produced in many crystalline rocks by natural decay of radioactive elements.

The hydrocarbon molecules found in natural petroleum are high pressure polymorphisms of the H-C system and evolve only in thermodynamic regimes of pressures greater than 25-50 kilobar (figure 2). These pressures correspond to greater depths then fossil substrates have been found (8). Quote from Kenney et al. (8): “Hydrocarbon molecules from petroleum reservoirs can not originate from biological matter, except for methane.” Personally I have to disagree with this because most natural petroleum clearly shows the presence of biomolecules from bacteria from the earth’s crust. Nonetheless, I agree with the abiogenic origin of most of the hydrocarbons in petroleum. This line of evidence is similar to the argument that the existence of diamonds near the surface provides; since diamonds only evolve under extreme pressures their mere existence proves that carbon is present at great depths (more on diamonds and deep gas in appendix II).

 

Figure 2. Stability of hydrocarbons at temperatures and pressures in the Earth (14). Pressure-temperature regime of Earth is indicated by the shaded region. Thermodynamic calculations indicate domains in which various hydrocarbon molecules are stable. The lines marked Paraffins, Naphthenes, and Aromatics enclose domains in which a mix of hydrocarbon molecules would be set up from hydrogen and carbon, and on crossing outward from these domains the percentages indicated would be retained. Methane is essentially stable to the left of the line marked 95 percent, and 10 percent would still be retained on crossing to the right of the line so marked (that is, 90 percent would dissociate into hydrogen and carbon). According to these calculations, most of the petroleum components would be present in equilibrium of a carbon-hydrogen mix at a depth between 100 and 300 km, and methane streaming up could bring a significant fraction of these petroleum components toward the surface. b, bar; kb, kilobar; km, kilometer; m, meter; T, temperature.

Biological debris would be unlikely to produce hydrogen-saturated hydrocarbons. The hydrogen/carbon ratio of biological materials is too low to produce hydrogen saturated hydrocarbons, and slow chemical processing in geologic settings would lead to a further loss of hydrogen. Yet most commercial hydrocarbon deposits contain methane and other high hydrogen components. The average hydrogen proportion is greater, the deeper the level from which the hydrocarbons are withdrawn, corresponding to a hydrogen loss during the upward migration of the fluids (15,16).

Hydrocarbons similar to those from meteorites form bulk of earth’s hydrocarbons (17,18).

Often oil or gas have been found in drilling wells in crystalline rock, and oil or gas is generated (23, 24, 25). In one occasion this was done on the initiative of the strongest supporter of the abiogenic theory in the west, Dr. Thomas Gold (26). While Gold claimed success critics pointed out the small amounts that were obtained, and possible contamination with oil from lubricating drilling mud. Later in a nearby borehole oil was produced while lubrication was performed with water (27).

Another overview paper on the abiogenic origin, though slightly dated, can be found at (28).

 

Conclusion and discussion

 

It is clear that there is compelling evidence for the abiogenic origin of fossil fuels. As J.F. Kenney (8) stated: "There has not been any 'debate' about the origin of hydrocarbons for over a century, competent physicists, chemists, chemical engineers and men knowledgeable of thermodynamics have known that natural petroleum does not evolve from biological material since the last quarter of the 19th century." (29). Apparently the idea of a fossil origin just remains too long in the school books and in the minds of many (petroleum) geologists who did not want to question the assumptions that were at the basis of their work. It is easy to make superficial assumptions about certain issues, but one should always be willing to question the basics of our thinking. Especially when it is thought that “something does not happen” it often is shown that there is an exception to that “rule”. Often this exception is overlooked or ignored until one investigative mind looks further and finds a new principle that sparks a new field of investigation with great benefits.

 

Acknowledgements

 

I wish to thank Antoon Akkermans for usefull suggestions and comments.

 

 

 

 

Appendix I

 

Isotopic evidence of the abiogenic origin

 

 

Figure 3. Distribution of ratio (expressed as d13C) of the stable isotopes 13C and 12C in different terrestrial materials. Methane and carbonate cements span a much larger range of these isotope ratios than all other forms of terrestrial carbon (7).

 

The isotopes of carbohydrates have been used for various scientific purposes. Isotopes of atoms are heavier atoms of an element that we find in nature, for instance carbon 13 instead of carbon 12, or hydrogen 2 instead of hydrogen 1. Molecules containing these heavier isotopes are relatively rare, and the ratio between normal molecules and molecules with heavier isotopes can vary. Because of the higher weight of the heavier isotope of CO2 there is a selection in plants for a higher uptake of carbon 12 during photosynthesis. This happens because the lighter CO2 is taken up faster across the membrane of the plant. Normal CO2 has a higher diffusion speed than C-13 CO2.

 

This higher diffusion speed also plays an important role in the determination of the isotopic ratio if methane. As methane travels upward through the crust of the earth it sometimes passes through wet spots or porous rocks, where fractionation can occur. This fractionation leads to a broad range of isotopic ratios in methane (figure 3). Often the isotopic ratio of carbon in methane has led scientists to assume that the origin of the methane is biological because of the C-13 deficiency. But the C-13 deficiency in methane is often far greater than can be found in plants, which is a clear indication for fractionation in the earth. In some cases the carbon from methane from the earth has a higher isotopic ratio than carbon from plants. This could be an indication of the abiogenic origin, or the ratio is also due to fractionation in the earth while the C-13 deficient fraction has already escaped.             

 

The isotopic ratio of atmospheric CO2 has a relatively small range because CO2 molecules from various sources get mixed relatively quickly in the atmosphere. Geological records show that this ratio has been remarkably constant from early Archean times to the present (19). This is also a strong argument against the biological origin theory. If plants have taken all the carbon sources in the earth from the atmosphere over millions of years, the atmosphere would have built up more and more C-13 CO2. Also the amount of oxygen in the atmosphere would be much larger than it is now.   

 

 

Figure 4. Carbon isotope ratios (expressed as d13C) of methane plotted against depth of occurrence (20). Although there is much variability in this relationship, it is almost always true that where methane is found at different levels in the same area, the methane is isotopically lighter (contains less 13C) the shallower the level.

Methane tends to be isotopically lighter, the shallower the level (figure 4). This appears to be true irrespective of the type or age of the formation from which the sample was taken. Some methane appears to be lost to oxidation, ending up as carbon dioxide, and a fraction of that in turn as calcite cements. This oxidation process seems to prefer the heavy isotope and so the remaining methane gets isotopically lighter on the way up. At each level the calcite thus derived from the already fractionated methane and so it also will become lighter, but always remaining heavier than the methane at that same level.

 

Appendix II

Deep earth Gas and Earthquake Prediction

 

The theory prediction of earthquakes, is related to the deep earth gas theory (41). New methods for earthquake prediction can be developed when upwelling gas is taken seriously as a cause of  earthquakes (30). The results of the standard prediction methods still leave much to be desired (31). The new prediction methods would probably not be sufficient to predict all earthquakes. Near faultlines erupting gasses may facilitate the release of the stresses in the crust, thus causing earthquakes in some occasions, while there might be entirely “gas driven” earthquakes or entirely fault related earthquakes as well. The theory of upwelling gas causing earthquakes relies on the existance of gas deep in the crust of the earth. The existance of natural diamonds indicates that deep in the earth carbohydrates are present. Diamonds are a stable form of carbon at pressures from 45 kilobar; corresponding to depths of 150 kilometers or more. Geological formations in which diamonds occur near the surface are called “Kimberlite pipes”, these are deep shafts filled with a mixture of rock types (fig 5). These rocks have originated from great depths (32)  The Kimberlite rocks have ascended rapidly (33)  which allows the diamonds to cool down sufficiently quickly so that they do not desintegrate to graphite. Tiny pore spaces in diamonds have been analyzed and found to contain small amounts of highly compressed carbon dioxide and methane (34).

 

Figure 5.  Model of a Kimberlite pipe (35).
 

There were two observations before the earthquake at Loma Prieta on October 17, 1989 that seemed to be gas related and are clearly just prior to the earthquake (36 and 37). These observations were made for purposes unrelated to earthquake research, but still seem to be the best earthquake-predictive observations for this earthquake. The observation of the amount of helium in a shallow well showed a sharp increase a day before the quake (Figure 6). This may have represented an increased flow of gases upwards through the rocks, that had gathered up the helium that had accumulated in the pores.

Figure 6.  Helium measurements before a major earthquake (38).

 

The other observation was the steep increase of the local magnetic field amplitude, registered just before the quake (Figure 7); this may be attributed this to the interruption and reconnection of earth currents normally flowing in the groundwater, by bubbles of insulating gases that stream through the pores of the rock. 

Upwelling gas might also explain the success of a recent method that has been used to predict earthquakes in China (39). This method predicts earthquakes based on temperature increases observed by satellites. These temperature increases may be caused by gas upwelling from deeper, hotter layers.

Figure 7.  Increase of a local geomagnetic field in advance of an earthquake(40).

 

Appendix III

 

A possible explanation for paranormal phenomena

 

Parapsychology

 

Parapsychology is a branch of science that has been ignored by most scientists. This is not surprising; there have been many good reasons to ignore parapsychology as a serious branch of science;

-Parapsychological phenomena often lack a decent scientific explanation.

To give a scientific explanation of certain parapsychological phenomena it seems that the “normal” laws of physics have to be ignored in many cases.

-There have been many frauds; people who claim psychic abilities or phenomena that turn out to be tricks; Uri Geller is a well known example.

-Parapsychological phenomena often lack repeatability. Often paranormal phenomena are experienced by individuals; recounts of these experiences are not acceptable as scientific evidence for a phenomenon.

-Parapsychological phenomena rarely have a direct use, and research into psychic phenomena usually does not contribute to the development of a readily producible application.

 

Nonetheless parapsychology has remained a work field for some scientists; they have repeatedly shown that they can produce results that can not be explained by normal scientific explanations. The results are just to “weird” for a simple scientific explanation.

 

On the other hand physicists have developed their own “weird” theories.. It has even been argued that if you think that you understand quantum physics that only shows that you have not understood it at all. Some of the results from quantum physical experiments have defied our understanding of matter and time. These experiments have attracted my interest because some properties of quantum physics, like the possibility to transfer information via quantum resonance, seem the only way to give a scientific explanation for the results of certain parapsychological experiments.

 

 

Evidence of parapsychological phenomena: “The Ganzfeld experiments”

 

The ganzfeld studies have generated more publicity than any other field in paranormal research. This is the result of detailed meta-analyses of the ganzfeld studies by a leading ganzfeld researcher, Honorton [9], and a critic of this work, Hyman [10]. The ganzfeld technique is designed in order to send information from a sender to a receiver in a classically inexplicable way, such as telekinesis. Since the signal from the sender is believed to be very weak the researchers shield a receiver from normal sensory input. In theory this would allow the receiver to be able to receive any weak signals from a sender in another room without disturbance from normal sensory input. The sender gets to see a picture or a repeated short video clip for a while which is randomly chosen from a collection of four. After the experiment the receiver has to indicate which of the four pictures or video clips has been observed by the sender. If telekinesis plays no role in the outcome of such an experiment one would expect the receiver to choose the right picture in 25% of the cases. In a meta analysis of 11 different ganzfeld experiments with 240 test subjects (receivers) over 329 trials there were 106 hits. The average score of the receivers is 32%, which is statistically a highly significant effect (Z score of 2.89). In this study no explanation was given how this effect can be explained.

 

 

“Retro PK Experiments”

 

Retro PK experiments are designed to demonstrate influence of our mind over matter. In order to test this influence some large scale experiments have been designed in which the research subject attempts to influence the outcome of a true random number generator*. The idea is that the subject looks at a graphical representation of the outcome of the random number generator and attempts by will to change the outcome. The results of these experiments are small, but in some cases statistically significant results have been published. Some of the largest experiments in Retro PK, (http://www.fourmilab.ch/rpkp/) show very little evidence that humans were able to influence the outcome of the random number generators. This might be explained by the fact that in these experiments recordings from live number generators were used. To create a significant outcome, the subject should alter the outcome of a RNG in the past! In this experiment there was a significant outcome when only the sign of the outcome was analysed. When people indicated they would try to influence the outcome in one specific direction then the outcome of the RNG that was selected was shifted in that direction in enough experiments to yield a significant result. There can be different explanations for this (the subject might just "predict"the experiment that will be selected by the computer instead of really influencing the RNG in the past). And since only the sign of the outcome is analysed a lot of data is ignored. Therefore I find the resuts of this experiment not sufficiently convincing.

 

 

*: A true random number generator generates random numbers based on an effect in nature such as radioactive decay, instead of a completely computer generated random number generator. A computer based random number generator can not be used because it uses a mathematical algorithm to generate a series of numbers that has the properties of a stream of real random number but these numbers are calculated. These numbers could in principle be predicted if the algorithm was known and the outcome of the “random” number generator is dependent on the algorithm and can not be influenced.

 

 

The quantum mind

 

Some time ago I came across a theory that just might give a possible explanation for Psi phenomena, the so called “Orch OR” theory (51). This theory states that our brains are not the clockwork like processing organs we once thought them to be. Rather they have a link to quantum physics via the microtubuli in the cells of the brain, thus enabling the brain to produce phenomena comparable to the strange results some physicists have had in their experiments dealing with quantum physics. The theory states that the proteins that make up the long filaments called microtubuli in the brain can flip between two states. The tubulin proteins of one state can form patterns that move across the microtubulus; thus transporting information. The proteins can also be present in a quantum state of both configurations when isolated. When this quantum state is isolated long enough it can collapse on itself to a normal state. When this collapse occurs information is generated in the microtubuli presumably in the form of patterns of tubulins in a specific configuration. Via interaction with other proteins this information might be responsible for firing of the braincells (69). This theory gives a possible explanation of how the brain can become conscious of things that only can be perceived via quantum physics, such as backwards time referral (68). The isolation of the microtubuli in the brain occurs at a frequency of 40 Hz.

 

 

 

Quantum physics; feasible in the brain?

 

Quantum physics is a relatively new branch of science that has generated some astonishing breakthroughs in our understanding of the world. Quantum physics has shown that at a molecular level the world works very different from the world of our every day lives. A molecule for instance that can be either in an A conformation or a B conformation can according to quantum physics be in a so called superposition of A and B at the same time! Such a superposition can not be measured directly; when a measurement is performed the molecule will show either the A or B position. The superposition of A and B collapses to either A or B when you measure the molecule. Physicists have done experiments with quantum superpositions in sophisticated laboratories at near zero (Kelvin!) temperatures so that the superpositions would be stable for at lest a short while. This stability problem has somehow also been solved by nature, at much higher temperatures.

Another problem that physicists have encountered in using quantum physics for calculations is the problem of decoherence. No matter how well you isolate a quantum superposition, sometimes it does return to a normal state when it is not desired, just because of interaction with its environment. In quantum computing this can introduce errors, and these errors need to be corrected somehow. Some schemes for correcting these errors have been proposed for building a quantum computer, but it will take quite a while before science is able to build a usefull quantum computer. In biology in the other hand quantum computing is proposed to occur on a large scale in the microtubili in the brain, and error correction for local decoherence can occur by restoring a pattern in a microtubulus (figure 11).

 

Figure 11. A microtubule topological qu-tetrit. Four vibrational patterns in the microtubule lattice (top), which correlate with functional attachment patterns of microtubule-associated proteins are the eigenstates of a quantum superposition of all fours states (bottom). Quantum computation in the superposition phase reduces to one particular eigenstate pattern. The topological patterns are resistant to decoherence at the level of any particular subunit.

 

The microtubule lattice features a series of helical winding patterns that repeat on longitudinal protofilaments at 3,5,8,13,21 and higher numbers of tubulins. These particular winding patterns (whose repeat intervals match the Fibonacci series) define attachment sites of the microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs), and are found in simulations of self-localized phonon excitations in microtubules (52). They suggest topological global states in microtubules which may be resistant to local decoherence. It has been suggested that the Fibonacci patterns on microtubules may be optimal for error correction.

 

Of further interest is the argument that synaptic signal transmission has a quantum character (53, 54), although the debate on this issue has not been conclusive (55).

 

New developments in magnetic resonance imaging of the brain demonstrate that artificially induced quantum coherences of proton spins separated by distances ranging from micrometers to 1 mm are sustained for hundreds of seconds and longer (56-58).

 

Some evidence also supports biological quantum states (46).

 

The “Orch OR” theory proposes that the tubulin proteins of the microtubuli exist for some time in a quantum superposition in the brain. Quantum physicists find this hard to accept because they can demonstrate quantum superpositions in the laboratory only in a very well controlled environment. This is because quantum superpositions are very unstable. A quantum superposition returns to a normal state when a measurement is performed of the molecule in superposition. This means that any contact with the environment can return the tubulin to a normal state. It seems unlikely that in the brain the microtubuli can be isolated well enough to allow quantum superpositions to exist for some time. A biological solution for this problem has been proposed that would allow the microtubuli to be isolated well enough from their environment for a sufficient amount of time and allow interaction with the microtubuli to transfer information (45). Nature may have solved this problem of both isolation and communication by alternating cytoplasmic phases of solution ("sol", liquid, sensitive to environment, classical) and gelation ("gel", solid, shielded/insulated, quantum). Thus microtubules can be both sensitive to their environment ("sol" phase) and isolated/shielded ("gel" phase) (figure 8).

 

Figure 8 Schematic sequence of phase of actin gelation/quantum isolation (1­3) and solution/environmental communication (4) around MT. Cycles may occur rapidly, e.g., 25 msec intervals (40Hz) (42).

 

 

 

Figure 9: Negative charges on the C-terminus tail of the tubulin dimer are screened under physiological conditions by counterions forming a Debye layer around the microtubule (49).

 

Figure 10. Immunoelectron micrograph of cytoplasm showing microtubules (arrows), intermediate filaments (arrowheads), and actin microfilaments (mf). A dense actin gel (lower left) completely obscures

the microtubules below. Scale bar at upper right represents 500 nm (44).

 

 

 

 

The “presentiment” experiments by Dr. Bierman and others show that a response to a signal can be recorded in the brain before the signal is given (47, 48 and 49). How can information run backwards in time? Penrose first suggested that quantum effects in the brain could explain backwards referral, and that such effects may occur commonly, even routinely. It turns out that in quantum mechanics, quantum information can indeed run backwards, or be time indeterminate. The Aharonov formulation (50) suggests that each quantum state reduction has a dual vector, both forward and backwards in time.

 

 

 

 

Appendix IV 

 

Plate tectonics

 

                          

One of the most important paradigm shifts in recent science was the development and acceptance of the theory of plate tectonics. This theory was developed first by Alfred Wegener in 1912, although by that time the theory was still flawed in some important respects. Wegener was right in seeing that the continents must once have been together and are moving.  He also was right to propose that this movement of continents creates mountain ranges where the continents collide. Unfortunately his theory lacked a geological mechanism to explain how the continents could drift across the earth’s surface as he proposed. Now we know that the continents do not move as such; rather the crust of the earth is divided in a number of plates that move across the liquid inner part of the earth, driven by convection. The continents are merely higher parts of land on these plates and do not move across the ocean floor, as Wegener first hypothesised.

 

 

 

Appendix V

 

Photosynthesis: Is sunlight really necessary?

 

“Photosynthesis is the process where plants use the energy of sunlight as a source of energy.” This sentence is wrong in two parts; firstly not only plants, but also algae and bacteria have photosynthesis. Secondly not only sunlight is used for photosynthesis. You might think that I mean that nowadays also artificial light is often used or that plants might also be able to use moonlight (essentially reflected sunlight), but that is not what I mean. The photosynthesis I am talking about happens in bacteria living 2000 meters deep in the ocean near hydrothermal vents. These bacteria use geothermal light from the hot black smokers for their photosynthesis next to their normal metabolism. Geothermal light is light that is emitted by heat; when an object is hot it glows. The black smokers emit water that can be up to 400 C, and this high temperature emits infrared light that can be used by some bacteria for photosynthesis (60).

 

 

Appendix VI
 

Thomas gold: The theory of hearing

 

Thomas Gold is a scientist who has developed several scientific theories that were accepted only long after they were published. He is an astronomer by training, but adapt in many other fields. He has 280 publications in various fields of science, including cosmology, mechanism of mammalian hearing, nature of pulsars as rotating neutron stars, aspects of solar system research and origin of planetary hydrocarbons (61). The paragraph about the theory of hearing and much of the abiogenic origin of fossil fuels are based on his work. Even though he was not the first to see that the origin of petroleum is abiogenic, he is an important reminder for western scientists; he has even drilled in Swedish granite to prove the abiogenic origin theory!

 

The development of the theory of hearing: "How do we discriminate a pure tone from an impure one?" This was the question in 1946, when Thomas Gold was investigating this subject. In this case an impure tone is defined as a tone that does not have a constant frequency. We are easily able to discriminate a pure tone from a tone that wobbles by as little as one percent. There were two possible theories that explain how we are able to do this; either the inner ear contains resonators that vibrate in response to the corresponding frequency or the ear does not resonate, but directly converts sounds into neural signals that are analysed in the brain. In 1946, experts in the anatomy of the ear believed in the second theory because the inner ear is only a small cavity filled with flesh and water. They did not see how this could resonate to sound like the strings of a piano. Gold designed an experiment to prove the experts wrong. If it is true that the inner ear resonates with a tone, than test subjects should be able to tell the difference between a constant phase and an alternating phase of a tone after an interval. According to the first theory the inner ear should keep resonating for some time after the first tone was heard.  In this experiment he demonstrated that test subjects are able to tell whether the phase of a tone is constant or alternating, even after an interval of thirty times the length of the tone. Gold published two papers from this experiment in 1948; one with the results of these experiments and one describing the theory on the workings of the inner ear (62). The auditory physiologists of the time found the theory implausible and the experiment unconvincing. After thirty years a new generation of auditory physiologists found out that the theory of the resonating inner ear was correct by discovering the hair cells that resonate in the inner ear. The community of physiologists recognised the importance of Gold’s work forty years after it was published.

This paragraph was summarised from the foreword of Gold’s book “The Deep, Hot Biosphere” (63). Gold’s Theory of hearing was recently revived and refined (64).

More information on the workings of the ear can be found in (66) and (67).

 

 

References

 

1: Hunt, J. M. Petroleum Geochemistry and Geology 2nd Edn (Freeman, New York, 1996).

 

2: Tissot, B. P., Pelet, R. & Ungerer, P. Thermal history of sedimentary basins, maturation indices, and kinetics of oil and gas generation. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 71, 1445–1466 (1987).

 

3: Kortenkamp SJ, Wetherill GW, Inaba S. Runaway growth of planetary embryos facilitated by massive bodies in a protoplanetary disk. Science. 2001 Aug 10;293(5532):1127-9.

 

4: Gold T. The deep, hot biosphere. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jul 1;89(13):6045-9. The “Deep Hot Biosphere” theory was submitted to Nature in June 1983, and rejected. It was finally published in PNAS in 1992 USA (89: 6045-49) upon the concurrence of Dr. Carl Woese and Dr. Gordon MacDonald.

 

5: Eigenson, A.S. On quantitative study of formation of technogenic and natural hydrocarbon systems using methods of mathematical modelling.  Khimiya i tekhnologiya Topliv i Masel. 1990, No 9, pp. 3-8, No 12, pp. 19-254; 1991, No 5, pp. 1-26.

 

6: Boreham CJ, Fookes CJ, Popp BN, Hayes JM. Origin of petroporphyrins. 2. Evidence from stable carbon isotopes. Energy Fuels. 1990;4(6):658-61.

 

7: T. Gold, “The origin of methane in the crust of the earth,” in David G. Howell, ed., The Future of Energy Gases, USGS Professional Paper 1570. http://people.cornell.edu/pages/tg21/usgs.html

 

8: Kenney JF, Kutcherov VA, Bendeliani NA, Alekseev VA The evolution of multicomponent systems at high pressures: VI. The thermodynamic stability of the hydrogen-carbon system: the genesis of hydrocarbons and the origin of petroleum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 20;99(17):10976-81.

 

9: Mendeleev, D., 1877. L'origine du petrole. Revue Scientifique, 2e Ser., VIII, p. 409-416.

 

10: Kent, P. E., and Warman, H. R., 1972. An environmental review of the world's richest oil-bearing region - the Middle East. Internat. Geolo. Congr. 24th, Sect. 5, p. 142-152.

 

11: B. Sherwood Lollar, T. D. Westgate, J. A. Ward, G. F. Slater & G. Lacrampe-Couloume Abiogenic formation of alkanes in the Earth's crust as a minor source for global hydrocarbon reservoirs. Nature. 2002 Apr 4;416(6880):522-4.

 

12: Horita, J. & Berndt, M. E. Abiogenic methane formation and isotopic fractionation under hydrothermal conditions. Science 285, 1055–1057 (1999).

 

13: P.N. Kropotkin, 1997, “On the history of science: Professor N.A. Koudrayavtsev and the development of the theory of origin of oil and gas,” Earth Sciences History 16: 13-20. Presented at a conference in Moscow in 1995, honoring Professor Kudryatsev's contributions to the field. http://people.cornell.edu/pages/tg21/Krop.html

 

14: Chekaliuk, E. B., 1976. The thermal stability of hydrocarbon systems in geothermodynamic conditions. Degazatsiia Zemli i Geotektonika (P N. Kropotkin, ed.) p. 267-272.

 

15: Robinson, R., 1963. Duplex origin of petroleum. Nature 199, p. 113-114.

 

16: Robinson, R., 1966. The origins of petroleum. Nature 212, p. 1291-295.

17: Sylvester-Bradley, P. C., 1964. The origin of oil and life. Discovery 25, p. 37-42.

18: Sylvester-Bradley, P. C., 1972. The geology of juvenile carbon. Exobiology (C.Ponnamperuma, ed.), pp. 62-94.

19: Schidlowski M., et al. 1975, “Pre Camabrian sedimentary carbonates: Carbon and oxygen isotope geochemistry and implications for the terrestrial oxygen budget,” Precambrian Research 2: 1-69.

20: Galimov, E. M., 1969. Isotopic composition of carbon in gases of the crust. International Geology Review, 11 (10), p. 1092-1104.

21: Boden,A., Eriksson,K.G. (1988). The Deep Gas Drilling in the Siljan Impact Structure,

Sweden, and Astroblemes in Series of Exploration of the Deep Continental Crust,

(Eds.), Vol.1, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 364.pp.

 

22: Thomas Gold 1985, “The origin of natural gas and petroleum and the prognosis for future supplies,”Annual Review of Energy 10: 53-77.

 

23:  BMFT ( Bundes-Ministerium fuer Forschung und Technologie ) -

Journal ( Journal of the German Ministry of Research and Technology )

Nr.3 June 1990 p.13

 

24: Kozlovsky, Ye. A. `The world's deepest well', Scientific American 251 ( no. 6, 1984 ) 98-104

 

25. Newscientist 115 ( 24 Sept.1987 ) p.26

 

26. Gold , T. , Newscientist 116 ( 15 October 1987 ) p.67

 

27. Aldhous, P. , Nature Vol. 353 ( 1991 ) p.593

 

28: Abbas S., “THE NON-ORGANIC THEORY OF THE GENESIS OF

PETROLEUM” arXiv:physics/9610011 v1 15 Oct 1996

 

29: http://www.aapg.org/explorer/2002/11nov/abiogenic.html

 

30: http://web.archive.org/web/20040417012642/www.people.cornell.edu/pages/tg21/

 

31: Murray J, Segall P. Testing time-predictable earthquake recurrence by direct measurement of strain accumulation and release. Nature. 2002 Sep 19;419(6904):287-91.

 

32: Kennedy, G.C. and Nordly, B.E. (1968). The genesis of diamond deposits Econ. Geol. 63, 495-503.

 

33: Kelley SP, Wartho JA.Rapid kimberlite ascent and the significance of Ar-Ar ages in xenolith phlogopites Science. 2000 Jul 28;289(5479):609-11.

 

34: Melton, C.E. and Giardini, A.A. (1974). The composition and significance of gas released from natural diamonds from Africa and Brazil. Amer. Mineralogist 59, 775-782.

 

35: Cox, K. G. (1978).  Kimberlite pipes.  Scientific American 238 (4).

 

36: Reimer, G.M. (1990). Helium increase. Nature, 347, 342.

 

37: Fraser-Smith, 1989= Bernardi, A., A. C. Fraser-Smith, and O. G. Villard, Jr., "Measurement of BART Magnetic Fields with an Automatic Geomagnetic Pulsation Index Generator," IEEE Trans. on Electromagn. Compat., 31,413-417, 1989.

 

38: Reimer, G.M. (1990). Helium increase. Nature, 347, 342.

 

39: http://ceos.cnes.fr:8100/cdrom-00b/ceos1/casestud/chinaq/chinaq1.htm

 

40: Fraser-Smith, A.C. et al. (1989). STAR Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.

 

41: Gold T. and Soter S., 1980, “The deep-earth gas hypothesis” Scientific American 242: 154-61

 

42: http://www.consciousness.arizona.edu/hameroff/Pen-Ham/Funda-Mentality/Fundamentality.htm

 

43: D. Sackett, Structure and function in the tubulin dimer and the role of the acidic carboxyl terminus. Subcell Biochem. 1995;24:255-302. Review.

 

44:  T. M. Svitkina, A. B. Verkhovsky, and G. G. Borisy, in Recent

Advances in Microscopy of Cells, Tissues and Organs, edited

by M. Malpighi and P. M. Motta (Antonio Delfino Editore,

Rome, 1997), pp. 93–100.

 

45: S. Hagan,1 S. R. Hameroff,2 and J. A. Tuszyn´ski3 Quantum computation in brain microtubules: Decoherence and biological feasibility PHYSICAL REVIEW E, VOLUME 65, 061901-11. (2002).

46: Walleczek, J. (1995) Magnokinetic effects on radical pairs: a possible paradigm for understanding sub kT magnetic field interactions with biological systems. In: Electromagnetic Fields: Biological Interactions and Mechanisms. M. Blank (ed) Advances in Chemistry No. 250 American Chemical Society Books: Washington, D.C.

47: Bierman, D. J. & Radin, D. I. (1997). Anomalous anticipatory response on randomized future conditions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 689-690.

 

48: Bierman, D. & Radin, D. I. (1998). Anomalous unconscious emotional responses: Evidence for a reversal of the arrow of time. In ( eds,.) Tuscon III: Towards a science of consciousness, MIT Press.

 

49: Radin, D. I. (1997). Unconscious perception of future emotions: An experiment in presentiment. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 11 (2), 163-180.

 

50: Reznik B, Aharonov Y. Time-symmetric formulation of quantum mechanics. Phys Rev A. 1995 Oct;52(4):2538-2550.

 

51: Stuart Hameroff Quantum computation in brain microtubules? The Penrose-Hameroff "Orch OR" model of consciousness. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society London (A) 356:1869-1896 (1998).

 

52: A. Samsonovich, A. Scott, and S. Hameroff, Nanobiology 1,

457 (1992).

 

53: F. Beck and J.C. Eccles, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89,

11 357 ~1992!.

 

54: G. Liu and J.L. Feldman, J. Neurophysiol. 68, 1468 (1992).

 

55: A. Larkman, K. Stratford, and J. Jack, Nature (London) 353,

396 (1991).

 

56: W.S. Warren et al., Science 281, 247 (1998).

 

57: R.R. Rizi et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 43, 627 (2000).

 

58: W. Richter et al., Magn. Reson. Imaging 18, 489 (2000).

 

60: Yurkov, V., and J. T. Beatty. 1998. Isolation of aerobic anoxygenic photosynthetic

bacteria from Black Smoker plume waters of the Juan de Fuca

Ridge in the Pacific Ocean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:337–341.

 

61: http://people.cornell.edu/pages/tg21/vita.html#T.%20Gold%20Vita

 

62: T. Gold, Proc. R. Soc. London B 135, 492 (1948)

 

63:  Thomas Gold, “The deep hot biosphere” 1999 ISBN 0-387-98546-8

 

64: Choe, Y., Magnasco, M. O. & Hudspeth, A. J. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 15321-15236.

 

65: "The power of hearing" http://physicsweb.org/article/world/15/5/8.

 

66: S Camalet et al. 2000 Auditory sensitivity provided by self-tuned critical oscillations of hair cells Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 97 3183-3188

 

67: V M Eguiluz et al. 2000 Essential nonlinearities in hearing Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 5232-5235

68: Hameroff, S.R., and Penrose, R. (1996b) Conscious events as orchestrated spacetime selections. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3(1):36­53.

69: Hameroff, S.R. (1994) Quantum coherence in microtubules: A Neural basis for emergent consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 1 (1):91-118.

 

70: K. Pedersen “Exploration of deep intraterrestrial microbial life: current perspectives” FEMS Microbiology Letters 185 (2000) 9-16

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

Home | The Origin | Bioinformatica

This site was last updated 03/20/06

 

Send mail to penninkhof@gmail.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2005 Evomind